Menu Close

Which method of periodization was followed by most of the English historians to write Indian history Why was that method not perfect for India?

Which method of periodization was followed by most of the English historians to write Indian history Why was that method not perfect for India?

Answer: The British historians divided Indian history into three periods as ancient, medieval and modern. This method of periodization was not perfect for Indian scenario because this had its own limitations.

Which method of periodization was followed by most of the English historians for Indian history?

The British historians periodised the Indian History into 3 periods as ancient, medieval & modern period. Explanation: This periodisation had many shortcomings. This method was derived from the West.

Which is the most accepted periodization of Indian history?

James Mill’s Periodization.

  • The most commonly accepted and less controversial periodization of Indian history is still based on the one proposed by James Mill in his History of British India.
  • 1 James Mill, The History of British India (London: Baldwin, Cradock, and Joy, 1817), 3 vols.
  • What was the periodisation of Indian history by British historians?

    In the middle of the nineteenth century British historians divided the history of India into three periods: “Hindu”, “Muslim” and “British”.

    What was the usual method of writing history used by the historians in the earlier times?

    they used methods like collection of evidence, research on the topic, going through manuscripts, original documents, visualising pictures, monuments, coins, buildings etc… pls mark it as brainliest…!

    Which of these is a part of periodization of the Indian history?

    Answer: ancient age, modern age, and mediaeval age all the answers are correct so the option d is absolutely correct..

    What is periodisation in history 8?

    Answer : Historians have divided history into broad time periods on the basis of some distinctive characteristics. This is called periodization.

    What did British historians in India write about class 8?

    Solution: British historians in India wrote about the Governor Generals and Viceroys who ruled India. Their History books contained the activities, policies and achievements of the Governor Generals and nothing more. All the recorded events with specific dates were linked to the lives of these Governor Generals.

    Who wrote the first comprehensive history of India?

    A Comprehensive history of India.

    Author: M K Dhavalikar; K A Nilakanta Sastri; Indian History Congress.
    Publisher: Bombay : Orient Longmans, 1957-<2013>
    Edition/Format: Print book : EnglishView all editions and formats
    Rating: (not yet rated) 0 with reviews – Be the first.

    What is the periodisation of Indian history?

    In 1817, James Mill, a Scottish economist and political philosopher, published a massive three-volume work, A History of British India. In this he divided Indian history into three periods – Hindu, Muslim and British. This periodisation came to be widely accepted.

    What is the periodisation of Indian history class 7?

    The British historians in the mid-nineteenth century divided India’s history into three periods, namely Hindu, Muslim, and British. The premise of dividing it this way was that the religion of rulers was the only important historical change, and there was no change in the social, economic and cultural aspects.

    What methods are used by historians?

    Primary Sources Something written or created by a person who witnessed a historical event.

    What is the problem with the periodisation of Indian history?

    This periodisation has its own problem. It is difficult to refer to any period of history as ‘Hindu’ or ‘Muslim’ because a variety of faiths existed simultaneously in these periods. It is also not justified to characterise an age through the religion of the rulers of the time.

    How is Indian history divided into three periods?

    James Mill divided Indian history into three periods – Hindu, Muslim and British. This periodisation has its own problem. It is difficult to refer to any period of history as ‘Hindu’ or ‘Muslim’ because a variety of faiths existed simultaneously in these periods.

    Who was the first to use tripartite division in Indian history?

    James Mill was probably the first to use the tripartite division to Indian history in the early 19th century. 11 Instead of the Ancient, Medieval and Modern categories he used ‘Hindu, Muslim and British’ periods.

    What was the period of British rule in India?

    Indian history could be neatly divided into three phases – the Hindu period lasting till 1190 followed by the Muslim Period with the founding of the Delhi Sultanate and ending with the Battle of Plassey (1760) which saw the beginning of British rule.