How were Lee and Grant similar in their tactics?

How were Lee and Grant similar in their tactics?

In terms of military tactics, both men were bold, decisive leaders. Lee is generally more praised for his tactical approach to particular battles, especially Chancellorsville, while Grant tended to be a more methodical leader, relentlessly putting pressure on the Confederate armies in order to exploit the numerical and …

What similarities does Catton and Lee Grant have?

Catton points out that the two were both great fighters who showed a great sense of determination. He also mentions their resourcefulness and propensity for risk-taking, and finally, their ability to move away from war and toward peace with relative ease when the time came.

What are differences between Grant and Lee?

Each man came from a different background. Lee’s was backward-looking, aristocratic, and agrarian, while Grant represented the forward-looking perspective of the industrial North, but both were men of courage and conviction.

Was Lee Grant and general friends?

The two friends would finally meet again following the Confederate surrender at Appomattox Court House. It was Longstreet, according to various accounts, who persuaded Lee that Grant would offer generous terms there.

What did General Lee think of General Grant?

Moreover, Grant recognize the new reality of warfare: that the firepower commanded by each side was making a battle of maneuver, like Chancellorsville, impossible. Lee didn’t think much of Grant as a general, saying that McClellan was the superior foe. On the other hand, Lee beat McClellan. He didn’t beat Grant.

Is Catton’s purpose in comparing Grant and Lee the same as his purpose in contrasting them?

Catton’s purpose in contrasting Grant and Lee was partially to make a statement about the eternal struggle between classes in US history, but this contrast also served to strengthen the comparisons he made.

Is Catton’s purpose in comparing Grant and Lee the same as his purpose in contrasting them that is do their similarities also make a statement about US history?

For what reasons does Catton contrast the two generals before he compares them?

In “Grant and Lee: A Study in Contrasts”, Bruce Catton contrasts the two generals before comparing them for two reasons: effect and build. By taking numerous paragraphs to describe both of their personalities, Catton builds up Grant and Lee as two noble men at two very different sides.

How are Robert E.Lee and Ulysses s.grant similar?

General Robert E. Lee and General Ulysses S. Grant had many similarities and differences. The biggest similarity is that they were both great civil war generals. They had a great deal of passion for what they were fighting for. They both wanted to preserve the Union but it was inevitable that the North and South would soon engage in war.

What was the difference between Grant and Lee?

Grant and Lee were both Civil War generals, but in addition to being on opposing sides of the dispute, they had very different backgrounds and military experience. There were major differences in their styles of wartime strategy, for instance.

What did General Robert E.Lee do for a living?

Lee was a traditional soldier who had a gift for leadership and was an inspiration for his subordinates. Through respect and admiration, Lee was able to get his men to do the impossible with very limited resources.

Who was the British general who endorsed Ulysses s.grant?

British military historian and Major-General J. F. C. Fuller strongly endorsed the greatness of Grant in “The Generalship of Ulysses S. Grant in 1929” and then in “Grant and Lee: A Study in Personality and Generalship” in 1932.