Table of Contents
- 1 Is the K to 12 effective?
- 2 Is K-12 effective in the Philippines?
- 3 Is online learning effective for K-12?
- 4 Is K to 12 basic education a success or failure?
- 5 Do children learn better in-person?
- 6 What is the disadvantage of K-12 curriculum?
- 7 Are there any negatives to the K to 12 system?
- 8 What is the impact of K to 12 education?
Is the K to 12 effective?
Graduates of the K to 12 program will be perceived with increased competency and have better global opportunities. The improved basic education curriculum is decongested and focused. Students will have more time learning core academic areas thus ensuring better comprehension.
Is K-12 effective in the Philippines?
Unlike the previous education system, K to 12 offers more opportunities for employment and entrepreneurship. Many schools in the Philippines are slowly implementing this. Graduates of the new system can instantly get a job after they receive their certificates and passing competency-based assessments.
Is online learning effective for K-12?
The overall results of the “meta-analysis found that, on average, students in online learning conditions performed better than those receiving face-to-face instruction” (U.S. Department of Education, 2009, p. Few rigorous research studies of the effectiveness of online learning for K–12 students have ▪ been published.
What countries have K-12?
Some of the countries who are under this system are USA, Australia, Singapore, Canada, India, Japan, China, Germany and the Philippines. If your country recently had the K12 implementation in the educational system, here are 10 things that you need to know. This system has its positive and negative sides.
What is the disadvantage of K 12 curriculum?
“The disadvantages of implementing the curriculum are real and urgent. Students need to adjust to the new curriculum and have to condition themselves in spending a longer time in school. Students have insufficient mastery of basic competencies due to congested curriculum.
Is K to 12 basic education a success or failure?
PISA 2018 shows similar results. Whether DepEd’s K to 12 exacerbated the problem is not clear, but what is obvious is that the new curriculum did not make things better. Therefore, in this light, DepEd’s K to 12 is a failure.
Do children learn better in-person?
Nishendu Vasavada said in-person learning is particularly important for kids with learning and developmental disabilities. The daily class structure, as well as the quality of interaction, is typically much better in the classroom than through a computer screen, he said.
What is the disadvantage of K-12 curriculum?
Is the K-12 program a good thing?
The K-12 program is still beneficial as it gives a better quality of education. In contrast with the old curriculum, the K-12 program offers a more focused and improved educational system in the country.
Who are the critics of the K-12 education program?
Critics say that its implementation could only worsen the issue on education in the country. Senator Antonio Trillanes IV, a known critic of the program, said that the country appears to be unprepared for K-12 due to inadequacy in resources, tools, classrooms, etc. (cited in Reyes, 2015).
Are there any negatives to the K to 12 system?
One of the cons or negative points is that most of these countries which implemented the ‘k to 12’ system did so suddenly and in the process, forcing parents to pay exorbitant fees for the additional two years of education.
What is the impact of K to 12 education?
Positive impact of K to 12: Strengthening education: One of the reasons that most nations migrated to K to 12 format was to improve overall education. Having better educated citizens makes you more innovative and competitive than other nations. As technology has progressed, an educated workplace is needed to maintain new advanced systems.