Should reporters reveal their sources?

Should reporters reveal their sources?

The idea behind reporter’s privilege is that journalists have a limited First Amendment right not to be forced to reveal information or confidential news sources in court. Journalists rely on confidential sources to write stories that deal with matters of legitimate public importance.

Why is it important for journalists to protect confidential sources of information?

JOURNALISTS must protect their confidential sources if the Press is to safeguard the interests of society. They may be whistle-blowers who are acting in the best interests of society but fear reprisals if their names are made public.

Can journalists be forced to reveal sources UK?

No court may require a person to disclose, nor is any person guilty of contempt of court for refusing to disclose, the source of information contained in a publication for which he is responsible, unless it be established to the satisfaction of the court that disclosure is necessary in the interests of justice or …

Who was the reporter that was treated with contempt for protecting source?

Earlier this week, the House Committee on Good Government and Public Accountability threatened to cite The Standard reporter Christine Herrera in contempt unless she named her source for a story about House of Representatives members who allegedly received bribes to approve the proposed Bangsamoro Basic Law (BBL).

When you’re allowed to use the information but not reveal the name of the source that’s called?

These three levels (which we will explain in detail) are: On the record, which means you can use both their words and their name; Non-attributable, which means you can use the information, but not the source’s name; Off the record, which means you cannot use either the information or the source’s name.

Why is it important to give privacy to a news source?

Ironically, confidentiality may be an essential part of bringing information to the public’s attention because as a publisher, you may only be able to gather the information if you promise not to reveal the information’s source. These legal protections are vital to the free flow of information in society.

Do journalists have to identify themselves?

Does a reporter have to identify themselves? Most news organizations agree that journalists generally should identify themselves and their news organization in the course of routine newsgathering. It is not appropriate to mislead or deceive someone you are interviewing or to use subterfuge to obtain the news.

Can reporters withhold information?

What is the relationship between reporter and source?

William Rashbaum: “The relationship between reporter and source is a delicate one…. The same can certainly be said for the relationships between management and ownership of the newspaper in the subjects of the stories that appear or, sometimes more importantly, don’t appear in their publications.

How are reporters protected from their sources in Maryland?

Maryland has a shield law, and reporters were protected from speaking against their sources only if the source was unnamed. But I had named them all, so I had to testify.” … “I really had to think a lot about what was my relationship with them [the sources who were rapists]. I knew this much: I was not going to testify against them.

Why do people depend on the news media?

People depend on news media for their information, and media must be credible to succeed as businesses. b. People get information from multiple sources other than the news media, so no one will be hurt if news organizations make mistakes now and then.

What kind of Reporters cover New York City?

“New York City is a tough, incestuous town when it comes to reporting on police departments and law enforcement in general, and the beat reporters who write about the police department usually cover both crime in the city and the department as an agency.