What did John Marshall think about the Indian Removal Act?

What did John Marshall think about the Indian Removal Act?

Chief Justice John Marshall wrote in the majority opinion that the Constitution gave to Congress, not the states, the power to make laws that applied to the Indian tribes. Despite this clear court victory for the Cherokees, Jackson openly refused to enforce it, and the Southern states ignored it.

What was John Marshall’s decision in Cherokee Nation v Georgia?

Georgia, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokee Nation was sovereign. According to the decision rendered by Chief Justice John Marshall, this meant that Georgia had no rights to enforce state laws in its territory.

What did John Marshall do?

John Marshall became the fourth chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court in 1801. He is largely responsible for establishing the Supreme Court’s role in federal government.

How did John Marshall help the Indians?

John Marshall was the longest serving Chief Justice in Supreme Court history and played a significant role in the development of the American legal system and federal Indian law. He established that the courts have the power of ‘judicial review’, the authority to strike down laws that violate the U.S. Constitution.

How did Andrew Jackson respond to Marshall’s ruling?

Jackson is famous for having responded: “John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it.” Although the comment is probably apocryphal, both Georgia and Jackson simply ignored the decision.

Did John Ross agree with the Indian Removal Act?

Pressured by the presence of the Ridge Party, Ross agreed on February 25, 1835, to exchange all Cherokee lands east of the Mississippi for land west of the Mississippi, asking for $20 million dollars. He made it contingent on the General Council’s accepting the terms.

What was John Marshall’s final ruling in the Worcester v Georgia case?

Georgia, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 3, 1832, held (5–1) that the states did not have the right to impose regulations on Native American land.

What did John Marshall base his ruling on in the Worcester case that made the Cherokee Nation a sovereign Indian nation?

Worcester v. Georgia
In their second Supreme Court case, Worcester v. Georgia (1832), Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall ruled that the Cherokee Nation was entitled to federal protection over those of the state laws of Georgia.

What was Chief Justice Marshall’s ruling in Cherokee v Georgia?

In his 1831 ruling on Cherokee Nation v. the State of Georgia, Chief Justice John Marshall declared that “the Indian territory is admitted to compose a part of the United States,” and affirmed that the tribes were “domestic dependent nations” and “their relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian.”

When did Congress pass the Indian Removal Act?

But Congress passed the removal law in the spring of 1830. The Indian Removal Act offered tribes in the East lands in an area west of the Mississippi (soon to be called “Indian Territory”).

Why was John Worcester opposed to Indian Removal?

A Congregationalist, he had gone to live among the Cherokee in Georgia to further the spread of Christianity, and he strongly opposed Indian removal. By living among the Cherokee, Worcester had violated a Georgia law forbidding whites, unless they were agents of the federal government, to live in Indian territory.

What did Jackson say about the removal of the Indians?

Jackson declared in December 1830, “It gives me pleasure to announce to Congress that the benevolent policy of the Government, steadily pursued for nearly thirty years, in relation to the removal of the Indians beyond the white settlements is approaching to a happy consummation.