Table of Contents
What opposing views did the Federalists & Anti-Federalists hold?
The Federalists wanted a strong government and strong executive branch, while the anti-Federalists wanted a weaker central government. The Federalists did not want a bill of rights —they thought the new constitution was sufficient. The anti-federalists demanded a bill of rights.
How did the Anti-Federalists and Federalists differ in their views on national government?
Those who supported the Constitution and a stronger national republic were known as Federalists. Those who opposed the ratification of the Constitution in favor of small localized government were known as Anti-Federalists. The Anti-Federalists argued against the expansion of national power.
Why did the Anti-Federalists oppose the new constitution?
The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the 1787 U.S. Constitution because they feared that the new national government would be too powerful and thus threaten individual liberties, given the absence of a bill of rights.
Why did the Anti-Federalists insist on a bill of rights?
Why did the Antifederalists insist on including a bill of rights in the Constitution? Antifederalists feared that without a bill of rights, the Constitution would not protect the rights of the people or of the states, making the federal government too powerful.
What success did the Anti-Federalists have in influencing the Constitution?
Led by Patrick Henry of Virginia, Anti-Federalists worried, among other things, that the position of president, then a novelty, might evolve into a monarchy. Though the Constitution was ratified and supplanted the Articles of Confederation, Anti-Federalist influence helped lead to the passage of the Bill of Rights.
What would the Anti-Federalists think about presidential power today?
During the ratification debates, Antifederalists charged that the President would become an elected monarch, that cabals would develop to ensure his reelection, and that the presidential veto power would be abused. Federalists maintained that the President would be accountable to both the people and Congress.
How did the Anti-Federalists differ from the Federalists quizlet?
The Federalists supported the Constitution and wanted a stronger national government. The Antifederalists opposed the Constitution because they wanted more power to remain with the states.
Why did the Anti-Federalists oppose the American Constitution quizlet?
The anti-federalists opposed the Constitution because they feared an overly-strong national government. Their strongest point was that a large government was too far from the people and that special interests and factions would take over.
Who are the Anti Federalists and what did they do?
See Article History. Anti-Federalists, in early U.S. history, a loose political coalition of popular politicians such as Patrick Henry who unsuccessfully opposed the strong central government envisioned in the U.S. Constitution of 1787 and whose agitations led to the addition of a Bill of Rights.
George Clinton was most likely a writer of The Anti-Federalist Papers under the pseudonym Cato. These papers were a series of articles published to combat the Federalist campaign. (Image via Wikimedia Commons, public domain, portrait by Ezra Ames)
Why did the Federalist Movement support the Constitution?
It made many people realized that the nation needed a stronger national government and led to the constitutional convention in 1787. Federalist supported ratifying the constitution because they believed that the constitution gave the national government the authority it needed to function effectively.
Who was the Anti Federalist judge in Rhode Island?
In Rhode Island, resistance against the Constitution was so strong that civil war almost broke out on July 4, 1788, when anti-federalist members of the Country Party led by Judge William West marched into Providence with over 1,000 armed protesters. The Anti-Federalists played upon these feelings in the ratification convention in Massachusetts.