Table of Contents
What was the New Jersey Plan simple definition?
The New Jersey Plan was one option as to how the United States would be governed. The Plan called for each state to have one vote in Congress instead of the number of votes being based on population. It was introduced to the Constitutional Convention by William Paterson, a New Jersey delegate, on June 15, 1787.
What did the NJ Plan Support?
William Paterson’s New Jersey Plan proposed a unicameral (one-house) legislature with equal votes of states and an executive elected by a national legislature. This plan maintained the form of government under the Articles of Confederation while adding powers to raise revenue and regulate commerce and foreign affairs.
Who benefits from NJ plan?
Advantages to the New Jersey Plan included giving smaller states equal power to larger states in the federal legislature, as well as giving the federal government more power to raise taxes, to regulate commerce, and to control foreign policy.
What are the cons of the New Jersey Plan?
Con. -Individual states lost some of their power to the government. -Slave holding states were able to partially count the amount of slaves they had as their popoulation. – Distributes power more evenly.
Why was NJ Plan important?
The Significance of the New Jersey Plan was: The New Jersey plan favored giving control of the federal government to the states, not the people through their representatives. The New Jersey Plan called for equal representation in which each state had the same number of representatives.
What is the New Jersey Plan for kids?
The New Jersey Plan represented the less populated states and wanted each state in the nation to have an equal amount of representatives in government. They felt that it would not be fair for states to have less power just because they have a smaller population.
Why was the New Jersey Plan unfair to larger states?
It made sure that small states and larger states would have the same number of representatives. Large states were states that had large populations. The delegates from large states thought it was unfair that equal representation was unfair. They though that states with larger populations should have more votes.