What did Patrick Henry feel was missing from the Constitution?

What did Patrick Henry feel was missing from the Constitution?

Henry believed that the absence of a bill of rights was part of the attempt by the few to amass power. Henry believed that these amendments did not adequately safeguard the rights of the people and the states. He therefore did not support them, instead calling for a new convention to revise the Constitution.

What act did Patrick Henry oppose?

the Stamp Act of 1765
Henry was elected to the Virginia House of Burgesses, where he quickly became notable for his inflammatory rhetoric against the Stamp Act of 1765.

Why did Henry feel that too much authority was given to the federal government?

The answer was pretty simple: Henry thought that the American Revolution was, at root, a rebellion against the coercive power of the British government. Henry, therefore, thought it was madness for Americans to place that same kind of consolidated political authority over themselves again.

Why did Patrick Henry oppose the Bill of Rights?

Anti-Federalism and the Bill of Rights Henry and other Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the 1787 United States Constitution, which created a strong federal government. Patrick Henry worried that a federal government that was too powerful and too centralized could evolve into a monarchy.

Why did Patrick Henry want the Bill of Rights?

As leader of the anti-Federalists, Patrick Henry demanded that the Bill of Rights be added to the U.S. Constitution to limit the federal government’s power more strictly, and to guarantee the protection of each and every citizen’s basic individual liberties.

How did Patrick Henry influence the Bill of Rights?

An outspoken Anti-Federalist, Henry opposed the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, which he felt put too much power in the hands of a national government. His influence helped create the Bill of Rights, which guaranteed personal freedoms and set limits on the government’s power.