Why was westward expansion justified?

Why was westward expansion justified?

When President Thomas Jefferson bought the Louisiana territory from the French government in 1803, it doubled the size of the existing United States. Jefferson believed that, for the republic to survive, westward expansion was necessary to create independent, virtuous citizens as owners of small farms.

Why was westward expansion Not Justified?

The United States expansion abroad was bad because it was based on the economic exploitation of people and resources from other countries. Expansion abroad was not justified because the United States infringed on the rights of other free people.

Why Manifest Destiny was justified?

The term “Manifest Destiny” was, in part, an expression of a genuine ideal on the part of Americans. But it was also a justification, in that they wanted territory and needed an excuse or justification for a push into territory that they did not control.

What were the benefits of westward expansion?

It brought more land for farming and improvement. Those who were in favor of the movement said that with more land area acquired, there were more agriculture land made available which was good for the economy and for supply of food and vegetables for the people.

Was the movement westward justified?

When you look at things using today’s ideas of morality and justice, the US was in no way justified in expanding westward. The lands in the West were occupied. They belonged to the Native Americans and to Mexico. In addition, might made right and America was justified in taking land if it had the power to do so.

Was the US justified in their decision to expand West and fulfill their Manifest Destiny?

The United States was justified in annexing Texas and California in its pursuit of Manifest Destiny, as it believed that it had to expand its territory from “sea to shining sea” and the annexation of Texas and California was required in order for them to achieve this goal.

Was America justified in our westward expansion?

By contemporary standards, though, westward expansion was justified. Americans were superior to the Indians and the Mexicans in terms of their culture and their race (this is the idea of Manifest Destiny). In addition, might made right and America was justified in taking land if it had the power to do so.

Was the United States justified in their decision to expand West and fulfill their Manifest Destiny?

Was Manifest Destiny a positive ideal for America?

With Manifest Destiny, most Americans got some chances to move, explore, and discover new places other than their usual community, and this was very beneficial in so many ways. The exploration is great for personal gain, socially, spiritually, and emotionally and economic improvement.

Was the westward expansion successful?

What were two effects of westward expansion? The settlers became successful farmers and built housing and factories. Unfortunately, the Native Americans lost their land and had to live on small reservations. In conclusion, the Westward Expansion led to America becoming a superpower.

How did westward expansion positively affect the United States?

The westward expansion resulted in more land acquisition, the development of railroads, an increase in the agricultural economy, immense wealth for industrial entrepreneurs, and greater overall power for the United States after the Mexican-American War.

Was the westward expansion good or bad?

Does the good of Westward Expansion outweigh the bad? The good outcomes outweighed the bad. Americans were able to obtain more resources such as land and gold which created more income. It allowed the population to spread out so cities weren’t over populated and opened up more opportunities for jobs.