What is an example of a meritocracy?

What is an example of a meritocracy?

a social system, society, or organization in which people get success or power because of their abilities, not because of their money or social position: The company is a meritocracy. Good work is rewarded with promotions.

What is the concept of meritocracy?

Meritocracy is a social system in which advancement in society is based on an. individual’s capabilities and merits rather than on the basis of family, wealth, or social. background (Bellows, 2009; Castilla & Benard, 2010; Poocharoen & Brillantes, 2013; Imbroscio, 2016).

Is meritocracy a social issue?

Meritocracy has become a leading social ideal. Politicians across the ideological spectrum continually return to the theme that the rewards of life—money, power, jobs, university admission—should be distributed according to skill and effort.

How is meritocracy a justification for social inequality?

Meritocracy and the justification of inequality. Thus, individuals who endorse a meritocratic worldview psychologically justify the status hierarchy by viewing members of high status groups as more deserving than low status groups.

What is meritocratic society?

Meritocracy (merit, from Latin mereō, and -cracy, from Ancient Greek κράτος kratos ‘strength, power’) is a political system in which economic goods and/or political power are vested in individual people on the basis of talent, effort, and achievement, rather than wealth or social class.

Is society a meritocratic sociology?

Meritocracy describes a society whereby jobs and pay are allocated based on an individual’s talent and achievements rather than social status. Therefore, individuals that work hard will be rewarded in society, whilst those who do not will not be rewarded.

Did Marx believe in meritocracy?

Marx also believed in the myth of meritocracy in that people are led to believe that we achieve according to merit in society. Marxists do not believe that society is based on a value consensus and operates to benefit all.

What is myth of meritocracy sociology?

Myth of meritocracy is a phrase arguing that meritocracy, or achieving upward social mobility through one’s own merits regardless of one’s social position, is not widely attainable in capitalist societies because of inherent contradictions.

Who believed in meritocracy?

sociologist Michael Dunlop Young
Although the concept of meritocracy has existed for centuries, the term itself was coined in 1958 by the sociologist Michael Dunlop Young in his dystopian political and satirical book The Rise of the Meritocracy.

What is meritocracy in world history?

Meritocracy is the idea that people get ahead based on their own accomplishments rather than, for example, on their parents’ social class. And the moral intuition behind meritocracy is that it creates an elite that is capable and effective and that it gives everybody a fair chance at success.

What are particularistic standards?

Term. PARTICULARISTIC STANDARDS. Definition. Standards or rules that only apply to one person/family/group. Term.

What are the candidate metrics for an egalitarian society?

Candidate metrics include resources, income, wealth, welfare, or capabilities to perform certain functions. The obligation to pursue equality along some such dimension makes (3) fully egalitarian in the contemporary sense of the term.

How does egalitarianism relate to the Civil Rights Movement?

As a view within political philosophy, egalitarianism has to do both with how people are treated and with distributive justice. Civil rights movements reject certain types of social and political discrimination and demand that people be treated equally.

Why are egalitarians committed to distributive justice?

Egalitarians are thus committed to distributive justice in a way that (1) need not be. (1) may entail a certain conception of distributive justice having to do with equality of opportunity and individual rights, especially property rights. For example, John Locke argued that all persons are equal and have the same rights.

What is the meaning of the egalitarian thesis?

If those inequalities arise within legitimate political institutions that respect the equal standing of all persons, they may be just. The egalitarian thesis addresses more than the moral worth of persons. It expresses an obligation to pursue distributive equality. Deviations from equality are prima facie unjust.