Table of Contents
- 1 How did sharecropping keep people in debt?
- 2 What problem did many farmers have under the sharecropping system?
- 3 How did merchants want farmers to repay their debts?
- 4 How much did sharecroppers get paid?
- 5 Why was it hard for sharecroppers to get out of poverty and debt?
- 6 What happened to farmers debt after the Civil War?
Many sharecroppers were former slaves. When they became free, they didn’t have the resources to buy all the things they needed in order to farm the land. As a result, they rented land from the landowners. When the sharecropper harvested his crops, he often didn’t make enough money to repay the debt to the creditor.
Did sharecroppers stay in debt?
The absence of cash or an independent credit system led to the creation of sharecropping. High interest rates, unpredictable harvests, and unscrupulous landlords and merchants often kept tenant farm families severely indebted, requiring the debt to be carried over until the next year or the next.
What problem did many farmers have under the sharecropping system? They were forced to grow cash crops instead of food. They often were trapped in a cycle or circle of debt.
How did sharecroppers fall into debt peonage?
Yet, because prices on cotton and other crops remained low, sharecroppers and tenant farmers often fell into a cycle of indebtedness called debt peonage: farmers found that the money they made selling their crops at the end of the growing season was not enough to pay back the loans they had taken out for seed, tools.
How did merchants want farmers to repay their debts?
The crop-lien system was a way for farmers, mostly black, to get credit before the planting season by borrowing against the value of anticipated harvests. Local merchants provided food and supplies all year long on credit; when the cotton crop was harvested farmers turned it over to the merchant to pay back their loan.
Was sharecropping good or bad for freedmen?
Many poor people and African Americans became sharecroppers after the Civil War. Sharecropping was bad because it increased the amount of debt that poor people owed the plantation owners.
Local merchants usually provided food and other supplies to the sharecropper on credit. In exchange for the land and supplies, the cropper would pay the owner a share of the crop at the end of the season, typically one-half to two-thirds. The cropper used his share to pay off his debt to the merchant.
How did sharecropping affect freedmen?
Nevertheless, the sharecropping system did allow freedmen a degree of freedom and autonomy far greater than they experienced under slavery. As a symbol of their newly won independence, freedmen had teams of mules drag their former slave cabins away from the slave quarters into their own fields.
Why was it hard for sharecroppers to escape the debt cycle? They could not make enough money to pay back their debt to landowners and buy their own land. back the debt, so they had to keep working for the landowners to repay them.
Which of the following was one consequence of the system of debt peonage that emerged during the 19th century?
What was the main effect of the system of debt peonage that emerged in the South during the late 19th century? African Americans labored in a system that was nearly the same as slavery. Debt peonage requires that a person’s debt be paid off through work.
What happened to farmers debt after the Civil War?
Why did farmers debt increase after the Civil War? Many white small farmers turned to cotton production during Reconstruction as a way of obtaining needed cash. The widespread destruction of the war plunged many small farmers into debt and poverty, and led many to turn to cotton growing.