Was the US right to use the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki essay?
The dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was justified at the time as being moral – in order to bring about a more rapid victory and prevent the deaths of more Americans. However, it was clearly not moral to use this weapon knowing that it would kill civilians and destroy the urban milieu.
What were the arguments against the use of the atomic bomb?
Those who oppose the bombings argue it was militarily unnecessary, inherently immoral, a war crime, or a form of state terrorism. Critics believe a naval blockade and conventional bombings would have forced Japan to surrender unconditionally.
What was the strongest argument in favor of dropping the atomic bomb on Japan?
What was an argument used in favor of dropping atomic bombs on Japan? It would prevent high casualties that would be caused by an invasion of Mainland Japan.
What is ironic about the Japanese surrendering after the dropping of the second bomb?
The cruelest irony lies in the fact that after dropping the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the United States did soften its uncon- ditional surrender provisions with respect to the emperor.
Why was dropping the atomic bomb bad?
It was inhumane. It caused too much destruction. It killed too many innocent people, including children. It was unnecessary as Japan was essentially defeated.
Why did the US threw the atomic bomb on Japan?
President Harry S. Truman, warned by some of his advisers that any attempt to invade Japan would result in horrific American casualties, ordered that the new weapon be used to bring the war to a speedy end. On August 6, 1945, the American bomber Enola Gay dropped a five-ton bomb over the Japanese city of Hiroshima.
Why did Japan take so long to surrender?
Washington has believed ever since that the atomic bomb decisively forced Japan’s surrender. With defeat imminent, Japan’s leaders feared that without the imperial house, the state and their own power would be devalued and diminished in the eyes of the people, and that the state would ultimately disintegrate.