What was the issue in the case Yick Wo v Hopkins?

What was the issue in the case Yick Wo v Hopkins?

Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886), was the first case where the United States Supreme Court ruled that a law that is race-neutral on its face, but is administered in a prejudicial manner, is an infringement of the Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Who won the Yick Wo v Hopkins case?

It was the first case to use the “equal protection” clause of the 14th Amendment, which prohibits states from denying any person within their jurisdiction the equal protection of the law. In a unanimous decision the Supreme Court ruled laws with discriminatory intent were unconstitutional.

Who won Yick vs Hopkins?

Who won the Yick Wo v Hopkins?

What happened to Lee Yick?

On May 10, 1886, Lee Yick won a Supreme Court case that said that all people — citizens and non-citizens — had equal protection under the law. Each sued, arguing that the fine and discriminatory enforcement of the ordinance violated their rights under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

What was the outcome of Yick Wo vs Hopkins?

Prior to 1886, racial discrimination was incredibly common. After the court ruling in Yick Wo v. Hopkins, the Court set precedent (meaning they made it clear going forward) that the law was blind to race and cannot discriminate based on that fact. Shortly after this case in 1896, the same Court ruled in Plessy v.

What was the rule of law in Yick Wo and Wo Lee?

Yick Wo and Wo Lee appealed to the United States Supreme Court. The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, please start your free trial or log in. The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

What was the ruling in the Yick Wo v Ferguson case?

The Court talked about the Yick Wo v. Ferguson case in their ruling, explaining that in that case, it forbid states from picking and choosing which races it wanted to discriminate against and which ones were ok. In the Plessy v.

Why was the Yick Wo laundry denied a permit?

Sang Lee and the Yick Wo Laundry were protected under the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause, which states that everyone is equal under the law. In this case, the Yick Wo Laundry was denied a permit under the city’s ordinance based on discrimination against the race of the owners.