Table of Contents
- 1 Why did they decide to remove Native Americans?
- 2 What was the main purpose of the Indian Removal Act of 1830?
- 3 What were the consequences of the Indian Removal Act?
- 4 Why did the English feel justified in taking away land from the indigenous population?
- 5 What are Jackson’s arguments regarding Indian Removal?
Why did they decide to remove Native Americans?
Most white Americans thought that the United States would never extend beyond the Mississippi. Removal would save Indian people from the depredations of whites, and would resettle them in an area where they could govern themselves in peace.
Why was the Indian Removal Act not justified?
No, the Indian Removal act isn’t justified because there was no law stating that the White Americans can move the Native Americans further west. The White Americans went against the Constitution. It just not fair because that was their land and the White Americans couldn’t just move them off their own land.
What was the main purpose of the Indian Removal Act of 1830?
The Indian Removal Act was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830, authorizing the president to grant lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within existing state borders.
Who benefited from the Indian Removal Act?
Most white Americans supported the Removal Act, especially southerners who were eager to expand southward. Expansion south would be good for the country and the future of the country’s economy with the later introduction of cotton production in the south.
What were the consequences of the Indian Removal Act?
Intrusions of land-hungry settlers, treaties with the U.S., and the Indian Removal Act (1830) resulted in the forced removal and migration of many eastern Indian nations to lands west of the Mississippi.
Why did Jackson want to remove the natives?
According to Jackson, moving the Indians would separate them from immediate contact with settlements of whites, free them from the power of the States, enable them to pursue happiness in their own way, and would stop their slow extinction.
Why did the English feel justified in taking away land from the indigenous population?
What this means is that the British felt that they were superior to the Native Americans. The British were, by their own lights, more civilized than the Indians. They were Christian while the Indians were pagan. These factors meant that the British were better than the Indians and were justified in displacing them.
What were the arguments in support of Indian Removal?
What were the arguments in support of Indian Removal? They felt that building factories, expanding farming, and constructing new roads and railroads would be a better use of the land. These people also believed that the white ways of living were superior to the Native American ways of living.
What are Jackson’s arguments regarding Indian Removal?
Jackson declared that removal would “incalculably strengthen the southwestern frontier.” Clearing Alabama and Mississippi of their Indian populations, he said, would “enable those states to advance rapidly in population, wealth, and power.”
Was the Indian Removal Act successful?
The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was approved and enforced by President Andrew Jackson. In the years leading up to the approval of the Indian Removal Act, Andrew Jackson was a main advocate for the cause. He successfully negotiated nine out of the eleven main treaties that forced relocation.