Menu Close

Why is Bill Russell not considered the best player?

Why is Bill Russell not considered the best player?

A dominant rebounder and defender and a strong-willed leader, Russell’s legacy on the court is long-lasting. Using the “greatest of all-time” standard that I proposed, Russell cannot be considered in the elite because although he won multiple times and excelled at defense, he was not dominant offensively.

Why is Jordan considered better than Bill Russell?

Jordan also has the highest scoring average of all-time but he is not greatest player ever and here is why. When you compare their numbers Jordan’s are the more sexier by comparison: 30.1 points, 6.2 rebounds and 5.3 assists to Russell’s 15.1 PPG, 22.5 rebounds and 4.3 assists.

Why is Wilt Chamberlain better than Bill Russell?

Wilt was the better player in the regular season, whereas Russell flourished in the playoffs. Wilt was non-existent in clutch or key situations, whereas Russell thrived in the intense situations. Wilt averaged 50 points a game in the 1961-62 season, that same season Russell was named the league’s Most Valuable Player.

Is Bill Russell the greatest player ever?

Bill Russell arguably is the greatest player to ever play the game both overall and on defense. While he may not have been exactly a great offensive player,(15 points per game career average, and 56% FT shooting with 44% FG shooting) he more than made up for his offensive struggles with his defense.

Who was better than Bill Russell?

Wilt Chamberlain was the most dominant player in NBA history. In head-to-head matchups vs. Russell, Chamberlain scored more points, grabbed more rebounds, passed for more assists…and lost more games. The 1961-62 season encapsulates their rivalry.

Is Bill Russell the best defensive player?

Even if you prefer modern basketball, Bill Russell has a legitimate case to be called the greatest defender in NBA history. As mentioned above, the NBA didn’t track blocks, steals, or defensive rebounds during Russell’s career; that leaves a bit of a hole in our understanding of his game.