Table of Contents
- 1 What happened as a result of the Pacific Scandal in 1873?
- 2 Who opposed John A Macdonald?
- 3 How did Sir Hugh Allan win the contract to build the railway?
- 4 How long did it take to build the CPR?
- 5 Why was Sir Hugh Allan important?
- 6 How much did the CPR cost?
- 7 Who was involved in the Canadian Pacific Scandal?
- 8 How did the Pacific Scandal affect Macdonald’s government?
- 9 What are the pros and cons of packing the Supreme Court?
What happened as a result of the Pacific Scandal in 1873?
The scandal led to the resignation of Canada’s first Prime Minister, John A. Macdonald, and a transfer of power from his Conservative government to a Liberal government led by Alexander Mackenzie.
Who opposed John A Macdonald?
His opponent in the 1891 election was Wilfrid Laurier, the new leader of the Liberals. Macdonald died three months after the election. Prime Minister when election was called; Prime Minister after the election. Leader of the Opposition when election was called; Leader of the Opposition after the election.
What was the new CPR company after Macdonald returned to office?
In 1909, CPR purchased the long-established Allan Line, and formed Canadian Pacific Ocean Services in 1914–5. After 1921, it became known as Canadian Pacific Steamships Limited.
How did Sir Hugh Allan win the contract to build the railway?
To ensure the contract, he bribed Prime Minister Sir John A. Macdonald, subscribing over $350,000 for Macdonald’s re-election campaign in 1872, but the Pacific Scandal (and Macdonald’s defeat) ended his dreams of supremacy in the railway business.
How long did it take to build the CPR?
Building the railway took over four years. James J. Hill in 1881 sent Alpheus Beede Stickney to be construction superintendent for the Canadian Pacific Railway.
How much is CP Rail worth?
Canadian Pacific Railway net worth as of November 16, 2021 is $51.32B.
Why was Sir Hugh Allan important?
Sir Hugh Allan, (born Sept. 29, 1810, Saltcoats, Ayrshire, Scot. —died Dec. 9, 1882, Edinburgh), Canadian financier and shipbuilder whose contribution of at least $300,000 to the Conservative Party campaign in 1872 precipitated the Pacific Scandal that brought down Sir John Macdonald’s government.
How much did the CPR cost?
The government gave the CPR $25 M in cash, 10 million hectares of fertile land, and an exemption from taxes. In exchange, the CPR agreed to complete the railway by 1891.
Who built the CPR?
So, the Canadian government hired an American contractor, Andrew Onderdonk, to start construction. Over the next seven years 15,000 men, including many Chinese labourers, built 545 km of track in British Columbia from Port Moody to Eagle Pass.
Who was involved in the Canadian Pacific Scandal?
The Pacific Scandal (1872–73) was the first major post- Confederation political scandal in Canada. In April 1873, Prime Minister Sir John A. Macdonald and senior members of his Conservative cabinet were accused of accepting election funds from shipping magnate Sir Hugh Allan in exchange for the contract to build the Canadian Pacific Railway.
How did the Pacific Scandal affect Macdonald’s government?
Perhaps even more damaging to Macdonald was when the Liberals discovered a telegram, through a former employee of Allan, which was thought to have been stolen from the safe of Allan’s lawyer, John Abbott. The scandal proved fatal to Macdonald’s government. Macdonald’s control of Parliament was already tenuous following the 1872 election.
Who was the Minister of Public Works during the Pacific Scandal?
Sir Hector-Louis Langevin, Minister of Parliament for Dorchester, Québec, and Minister of Public Works, Ottawa, July 1873 (courtesy Library and Archives Canada, PA-026409). Hector-Louis Langevin left politics in 1873 because of his role in the Pacific Scandal.
What are the pros and cons of packing the Supreme Court?
The Supreme Court is largely balanced. Court packing would increase political interference in an independent branch of government. It’s a slippery slope that would allow each president to add justices for rank political reasons. The appointment of justices is mostly balanced historically.